(Reading time: 10 - 20 minutes)

"This whole story started in 1965 when we decided to hijack a natural model and decide to start manipulating it. Science was hijacked when the only questions that could be asked were questions authorized under the patent protection of the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, and their equivalent organizations around the world."


Within the majestic walls of the European Parliament in Brussels, an astonishing revelation unfolded. Renowned patent auditing expert David Martin took center stage at the International Covid Summit, delivering a clarion call to the world. His words resounded through the hall, simultaneously unsettling and enlightening.

Martin’s discourse shattered the notion of the pandemic as a random act of nature, presenting it as a meticulously orchestrated maneuver by the United States. According to his narrative, this was not a spontaneous outbreak but a calculated scheme aimed at bolstering global acceptance of vaccines. His investigation traced back to 1999, unveiling a patent filed by the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention as the initial domino in the chain of events leading to the global pandemic.

This was no mere collection of claims and conjectures. Martin supported his statements with concrete evidence, referencing specific patents, dates, and studies. He pointed to the patent US7220852B1, filed on April 25, 2003, which covered the genome of the SARS coronavirus. He also highlighted the patent US46592703P, which he presented as evidence of the CDC’s control over the propagation of the virus.

The impact of Martin’s revelations reverberated through the audience, leaving them in a state of shock mingled with applause. His testimony deviated starkly from the mainstream narrative, serving as a wake-up call for many. It reminded them that in the realms of geopolitics and global health, appearances can often be deceiving.

Martin’s testimony ignited a call to action. It demanded transparency, accountability, and a profound reassessment of the systems and structures governing global health. His words served as a reminder that the pursuit of truth is an ongoing journey rather than a final destination, with much ground left to cover.

His discourse extended beyond the origins of the pandemic, delving into the murky realm of patent infringement. Martin pointed out Moderna’s 2015 patent application, which he claimed encroached upon the CDC’s patent. This, he argued, revealed the commercial interests lurking behind the scenes.

Another focal point of Martin’s discourse was Ralph Baric, a researcher at the University of North Carolina. Baric’s work on synthetically altering the coronavirus to enhance its pathogenicity, as well as his collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, came under scrutiny. Martin contended that this was further evidence of a deliberate manipulation of the virus.

Martin also questioned the official narrative surrounding the pandemic. He posited that the vaccines were not developed in response to the crisis but were already in progress. He pointed to the commencement of the mRNA vaccine development program in 2019, preceding the outbreak of the pandemic.

Martin scrutinized the reported efficacy rate of the Pfizer vaccine. He argued that the actual efficacy rate was considerably lower than the figures being touted. He dissected the clinical trials and the calculation of the efficacy rate, suggesting that it was misleading.

Martin also expressed concerns about the accuracy of PCR tests, referencing the patent application US7776521B1. He argued that these tests did not reliably detect the presence of the virus, highlighting a significant flaw in the global response to the pandemic. For more information about the reliability and results of PCR testing, see “The PCR Deception” mini-documentary Released by Derrick Broze here on TCRN.

Accountability and transparency became the crux of Martin’s call. He criticized the lack of open debate and discussion surrounding the issues he raised. His plea for a more inclusive dialogue served as a reminder of the vital importance of rigorous scrutiny and debate within the scientific community.

Martin’s testimony served as a stark reminder of the intricate complexities and controversies surrounding the pandemic. His discourse urged for a more nuanced and critically informed understanding of the crisis and the global response to it.

In his comprehensive dossier titled “The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier,” Martin delves even deeper into the matters he addressed during his testimony. This meticulously crafted document provides an extensive account of the events leading up to the pandemic, the roles played by various stakeholders, and the far-reaching implications of the global response.

The dossier proves to be a treasure trove of information, offering a wealth of references, citations, and evidence to support Martin’s claims. It presents a detailed timeline, tracing the origins of the virus, the development of vaccines, and the global response to the pandemic.

Additionally, the dossier meticulously analyzes the patents related to the virus and the vaccines, scrutinizing the roles of key players such as the CDC, Moderna, and Pfizer. It offers a critical examination of the commercial interests at stake and the geopolitical implications entangled within the pandemic.

The dossier advocates for transparency and accountability. It serves as a reminder of the urgent need for rigorous scrutiny and critical thinking in the face of a manufactured global crisis. It stands as a testament to the power of independent research and the unwavering pursuit of truth.

Perhaps the most eye-opening quote from his entire speech is one that should not be ignored. It is difficult to argue with if you have been paying attention.

“This is an act of biological and chemical warfare perpetrated on the human race. And it was admitted to in writing that this was a financial heist and a financial fraud.”


We use browser cookies to manage authentication, for analytics, and to ensure you get the best experience on our website.